Ronald E. Reed - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          and the statement of facts, we find that petitioner received                
          proceeds from his illegal drug activities, which were expended              
          to purchase the listed property, in total amounts as follows:               
          1985--$17,774; 1986--$179,209; 1987--$30,939.  Therefore, except            
          as necessary to reflect that one adjustment, we sustain                     
          respondent’s determination of deficiencies.4                                
          III.  Additions to Tax for Substantial Understatement of                    
                Liability                                                             
               Respondent also determined that petitioner substantially               
          understated his income tax liability and is liable for the                  
          additions to tax under section 6661 for 1986 and 1987.  The                 
          amount of an addition to tax for a substantial understatement of            
          income tax for a taxable year, which addition is assessed after             
          October 21, 1986, equals 25 percent of the amount of any                    
          underpayment attributable to such substantial understatement.               
          Sec. 6661(a); Pallottini v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 498, 500-503              
          (1988).  A substantial understatement of income tax is defined as           
          an understatement of tax that exceeds the greater of 10 percent             
          of the tax required to be shown on the return for the year or               
          $5,000, whichever is greater.  Sec. 6661(b)(1)(A).  Petitioner              
          has assigned error to respondent’s determination of a section               


          4    On brief, respondent states that $179,000 is the amount of             
          the 1986 expenditures.  That amount is slightly different from              
          the amount set forth in the notice of deficiency.  It appears               
          that the brief is in error.                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011