Restore, Inc. - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          result of the accrual of interest payable by petitioner, Matrix             
          recorded interest receivable from petitioner and a corresponding            
          amount of income.                                                           
               Beginning in 1983, petitioner reported a net loss on its               
          Form 1120, and continued to report losses until the year ending             
          December 31, 1988.  In the years ending December 31, 1989 and               
          1992, petitioner reported positive taxable income before taking a           
          deduction for net operating losses from prior years.  In 1990,              
          1991, and 1993 through 1995, petitioner reported net losses.                
          Petitioner reported no tax due and paid no taxes in all the years           
          1983 through 1995.  Petitioner's accrued royalties and interest             
          due on the accrued royalties to Matrix as of December 31, 1994,             
          were  $6,186,961 and $1,417,697, respectively.  Throughout this             
          time period, petitioner continued to accrue, deduct, but not pay,           
          royalties and interest related to the accrued royalties.                    

                                       OPINION                                        

               The first issue we must decide is whether petitioner may               
          accrue and deduct royalties computed but not yet paid under an              
          agreement with Matrix.  Respondent argues that petitioner is not            
          entitled to deduct the accrued royalties at issue because                   
          petitioner's liability to pay the accrued royalties was subject             
          to the contingency that profits must first be realized before               
          petitioner was to pay the accruals.  Petitioner's position is               
          that it may deduct the accrued royalties because the liability to           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011