- 11 - Department stated that petitioner was not required to file a return in 1992, and petitioner argues that the Treasury Department's authority supersedes respondent's determination in the deficiency notice. Petitioner's arguments are without merit and lack factual and legal foundation. In that regard, we are not obligated to exhaustively review and rebut petitioner's misguided contentions. Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417, 1417 (5th Cir. 1984) ("We perceive no need to refute these arguments with somber reasoning and copious citation of precedent; to do so might suggest that these arguments have some colorable merit.") Accord Casper v. Commissioner, 805 F.2d 902 (10th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1985-154. Standard Deduction Respondent determined that petitioner was not entitled to a standard deduction for 1992 because she was married filing separate returns. Respondent allowed petitioner a $3,700 standard deduction for 1993. Section 63(c) permits a standard deduction, in addition to deductions for personal exemptions, from adjusted gross income to determine taxable income. A married individual filing a separate return where either spouse itemizes deductions is not eligible for a standard deduction. Sec. 63(c)(6)(A). Petitioner did not present any evidence withPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011