Camille D. Sands, et al. - Page 18

                                         18                                           
          respondent.  Murphy's filing of an erroneous K-1 in 1989 does not           
          alter the ownership interests in Lone Star.                                 
          D.  Increased Interest, Additions to Tax, and Penalty                       
               1.  Increased Interest Pursuant to Section 6621                        
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for                  
          increased interest under section 6621 with respect to the                   
          underpayments for Sands' taxable years 1984, 1985 and 1986, and             
          for Heller's and Murphy's taxable year 1989.  Section 6621                  
          provides for an increase in the interest rate to 120 percent of             
          the statutory rate on the underpayments of tax if a substantial             
          understatement is due to a tax-motivated transaction.  Respondent           
          argues that the underpayments are due to a tax-motivated                    
          transaction, because Lone Star's purchase of the chlor-alkali               
          system was not a transaction entered into for profit.  See                  
          Clayden v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 656, 677 (1988).                           
               As for Heller and Murphy, the increased rate of interest               
          under section 6621(c) is inapplicable.  Section 6621(c) was                 
          repealed by sec. 7721(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act           
          of 1989 (OBRA 89), Pub. L. 101-239, 103 Stat. 2106, 2399,                   
          effective for tax returns due after December 31, 1989.  OBRA 89             
          sec. 7721(d), 103 Stat. 2400.  Murphy's tax return and Heller's             
          tax return for the taxable year 1989 were due after that date.              
          Sec. 6072(a).  As for Sands, Murphy served as legal counsel for             
          Micro-Bio when Micro-Bio executives traveled to Arizona to see              
          one of Eltech's chlor-alkali systems in operation.  Before Lone             




Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011