Sandy Lake Road Limited Partnership, J. Steve Anderson III, Tax Matters Partner - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          agricultural use.  Selling the property does not trigger the 1-d-           
          1 rollback; rather, it is the determination of a change in use              
          that triggers the rollback.                                                 
               The calculation of the rollback tax is based upon the                  
          difference between "market" and the property's agricultural use             
          value.  (The term "market", as used in Tex. Tax Code Ann. sec.              
          23.55 (West 1992), appears to be used synonymously with "fair               
          market value.")                                                             
               The purchaser of the Property, Pulte Home Corporation of               
          Texas (Pulte Home), required SLR to be totally responsible for              
          any and all rollback taxes assessed or to be assessed against the           
          Property and to take all steps necessary to trigger the rollback            
          provisions immediately prior to the date of conveyance of the               
          Property by SLR.                                                            
               By letter dated September 27, 1990, petitioner notified the            
          Dallas Central Appraisal District, Dallas, Texas, that the                  
          agricultural use of the Property was discontinued as of September           
          25, 1990.  The Dallas Central Appraisal District notified SLR on            
          December 12, 1990, that the Property no longer qualified for                
          open-space assessment and that the Property was subject to                  
          rollback taxes.                                                             
               An escrow account of $450,000 (unrelated to the previously             
          mentioned $450,000 reserved for the like-kind exchange) was                 
          established at closing for the purpose of funding the payment of            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011