Robert T. Schirle - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         

          assessments, sec. 6501(a), unless one of the exceptions to the              
          period of limitations is applicable; see sec. 6501(c).                      
               As we have found, petitioner did not submit a fraudulent               
          return with the intent to evade tax for any of the tax years                
          1988, 1989, or 1990.  Therefore, the exception contained in                 
          section 6501(c)(1) does not apply.                                          
               Respondent bears the burden of proving that the extended               
          6-year period of limitations specified in section 6501(e) is                
          applicable to petitioner's 1988, 1989, and 1990 returns.                    
          Davenport v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 921, 927-928 (1967); Quantz v.           
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-39.  Respondent did not raise the             
          application of section 6501(e)(1)(A) for the 1988 tax year.  In             
          an answer to petitioner's amendment to petition, respondent                 
          raised the application of section 6501(e)(1)(A) for the 1989 and            
          1990 tax years.  Based on our findings regarding the cashed                 
          checks and the yearend ledger adjustments, respondent has failed            
          to prove that petitioner omitted gross income in excess of 25               
          percent of the amount of gross income stated on his return.7                
          Thus, any assessments relating to the 1988, 1989, or 1990 tax               
          years are barred by the expiration of the period of limitations             
          on assessment.                                                              


               7  Respondent did not raise the application of sec.                    
          6501(e)(1)(A) in either of respondent's posttrial briefs.                   
          Accordingly, respondent may have intended to abandon this issue.            
          See Callahan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-132.                          




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011