Raymond Verni Schroeder - Page 5

                                          5                                           
          Schroeder claimed medical expenses, other taxes, and other                  
          miscellaneous deductions in the respective amounts of $5,093,               
          $998, and $1,160.                                                           
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent increased                      
          petitioner's income by $170 to reflect unreported wages earned by           
          Mrs. Schroeder.  Respondent determined that petitioner was                  
          required to include in income Social Security benefits in the               
          amount of $5,461.  Respondent determined that petitioner was                
          liable for self-employment taxes in the amount of $4,191.                   
          Respondent disallowed a portion of petitioner's claimed deduction           
          for medical expenses in the amount of $265 as a computational               
          result of the adjustments to petitioner's income.  Respondent               
          also disallowed a portion of petitioner's claimed deduction for             
          taxes in the amount of $9994 as personal expenses.  Respondent              
          disallowed a portion of petitioner's miscellaneous itemized                 
          deductions in the amount of $1,125 as personal expenses.                    
          Respondent allowed a deduction for one-half of the self-                    
          employment taxes determined, or $2,096.  Respondent further                 
          determined an accuracy-related penalty in the amount of $244 on a           
          portion of the deficiency in the amount of $1,222.                          
               Respondent's determinations are presumed correct, and                  
          petitioner has the burden of proving them erroneous.  Rule                  
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                       

          4    The difference between this and the amount claimed appears             
          to be due to rounding.  Respondent also decreased income by $1.             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011