Kenneth D. Shepherd and Martha A. Gregory - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               The second issue for decision is whether petitioners are               
          entitled to claim a bad debt deduction for 1991.  In the notice             
          of deficiency, respondent disallowed the claimed bad debt                   
          deduction upon the grounds that petitioners did not establish               
          that a debtor-creditor relationship was intended by the alleged             
          loan, and, even if such relationship existed, petitioners did not           
          establish that the debt was worthless or that any attempt was               
          made to collect the loan.                                                   
               As a general rule, section 166 allows a deduction for any              
          bad debt that becomes worthless during the taxable year.  Section           
          166(d), however, distinguishes business bad debts from                      
          nonbusiness bad debts.  Nonbusiness bad debts may be deducted in            
          the same manner as short-term capital losses, subject to the                
          limitations on capital losses as provided in section 1211.  Sec.            
          166(d); sec. 1.166-5(a), Income Tax Regs.                                   
               Nonbusiness bad debt means a debt other than a debt created            
          or acquired in connection with a trade or business of the                   
          taxpayer or a debt the loss from the worthlessness of which is              
          incurred in the taxpayer's trade or business.  Sec. 166(d)(2).              
          The use of the borrowed funds by the borrower is of no                      
          consequence in making the determination of worthlessness.  Sec.             
          1.166-5(b), Income Tax Regs.  In this case, the alleged debt                
          would have been nonbusiness debt created outside petitioner                 
          wife's trade as a librarian.  The funds were allegedly advanced             
          so petitioner husband would be able to further market the golf              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011