Kathie J. Smee, f.k.a. Kathie J. Zavitz - Page 4

                                          4                                           
                    (A)  Debts dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. sec. 523.                
                    (B)  Unless heretofore or hereafter determined by order           
               of this court to be nondischargeable, debts alleged to be              
               excepted from discharge under clauses (2), (4), and (6) of             
               11 U.S.C. sec. 523(A).                                                 
                    (C)  Debts determined by this court to be discharged              
               under 11 U.S.C. sec. 523(d).                                           
               3.   All creditors whose debts are discharged by this order            
               and all creditors whose judgments are declared null and void           
               by paragraph 2 above are enjoined from commencing,                     
               continuing or employing any action, process or act to                  
               collect, recover or offset any such debt as a personal                 
               liability of the debtor whether or not discharge of such               
               debt is waived.                                                        
               In October 1994, Mr. Zavitz filed a petition in bankruptcy             
          under chapter 7.  He was granted a discharge on February 9, 1995.           
          Mr. Zavitz filed a Complaint to Determine Tax Liability with the            
          U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas.  The              
          complaint included the tax years at issue herein.                           
               The case at docket No. 27416-89 was calendared for trial on            
          May 8, 1995, in Dallas, Texas.  Respondent's counsel moved for              
          entry of decision at that time.  No appearance was entered on               
          behalf of petitioner and Mr. Zavitz, although petitioner filed a            
          trial memorandum.  The Court took respondent's motion for entry             
          of decision under advisement and ordered respondent's counsel to            
          file a legal memorandum on the issue of whether the Court could             
          enter a decision while Mr. Zavitz’ complaint filed in the                   
          Bankruptcy Court was pending.                                               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011