Kathie J. Smee, f.k.a. Kathie J. Zavitz - Page 6

                                          6                                           
               The Court issued an Order dated October 7, 1996, lifting the           
          stay in the proceedings at docket No. 27416-89 and restoring the            
          case to the general docket for trial or other disposition.                  
          However, by notice filed with the Court on January 17, 1997,                
          respondent notified the Court that Mr. Zavitz filed a petition              
          with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas           
          on August 30, 1996, and all proceedings were automatically                  
          stayed, pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362(a)(8)           
          (1994).  Petitioner filed a status report with the Court on                 
          January 17, 1997, requesting that the proceedings be stayed as to           
          her, as well, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 362(a)(8).  By Order            
          dated January 23, 1997, the Court ordered respondent to file any            
          objection to petitioner's request.  On January 28, 1997,                    
          petitioner filed a motion to stay proceedings which was identical           
          to her status report filed earlier.  Respondent filed an                    
          objection to petitioner's request to stay proceedings.  A hearing           
          on the motion was calendared for February 24, 1997, in Dallas,              
          Texas.  Petitioner made no appearance at the hearing.                       
          Originally, petitioner and Mr. Zavitz were represented by                   
          counsel, William J. Ruhe, Jr.  William J. Ruhe, Jr., subsequently           
          was withdrawn as counsel of record for Kathy J. Smee, f.k.a.                
          Kathie J. Zavitz, on August 25, 1995.  Respondent filed a motion            
          for entry of decision as to petitioner which the Court took under           
          advisement.  Subsequently, as previously stated, the Court                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011