Raymond Strong - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
          only 10 miles, in light of the parties’ stipulation that the one-           
          way distance between his home and his workplace is about 34                 
          miles.  Supra table 3.  Finally, we do not have any explanation             
          of why on his tax return petitioner claims to have used his auto            
          to go to work on 250 days of the year (average daily round trip             
          commute of 10 mi., divided into total 1987 commuting distance of            
          2,500 mi.), while in his diary, petitioner claims to have had               
          business meals on 304 days.                                                 
               Even if we were to find that petitioner substantiated some             
          vehicle-related expenses, any such allowance would be well under            
          $1,000.  We note that both sides agree that the 2-percent floor             
          on miscellaneous itemized deductions is $3,350.  Supra table 2,             
          note 2.  Table 2 shows that, even if we were to allow $1,000                
          vehicle expenses, when added to petitioner’s remaining claimed              
          miscellaneous deductions it would not be enough to enable                   
          petitioner to pass the $3,350 threshold; thus petitioner is not             
          entitled to any net miscellaneous deductions.  Under these                  
          circumstances, it is not necessary for us to set a more precise             
          number on petitioner’s vehicle expenses, nor on his parking fees,           
          etc., nor on his other business expenses.  We have already deemed           
          petitioner to have conceded the claimed tax preparation fees.               
          Supra note 2.                                                               
               We hold for respondent on this issue.                                  








Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011