Kenneth Miles and Michon Snow Tesar - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          in the business use of their home.  Petitioners claimed a                   
          Schedule A deduction in the amount of $8,681 before the 2-percent           
          floor for petitioner's unreimbursed employee business expenses.             
          This deduction includes dues in the amount of $404, automobile              
          expense in the amount of $671, and vocational supplies in the               
          amount of $7,606.  On their Federal income tax return for 1992,             
          petitioners claimed a Schedule C deduction for car and truck                
          expense incurred by Mrs. Tesar in the amount of $3,084, including           
          depreciation expense in the amount of $2,780.  Petitioners also             
          claimed a Schedule C deduction for home office expense in the               
          amount of $2,193.  Petitioners claimed a Schedule A deduction in            
          the amount of $9,299 for petitioner's unreimbursed employee                 
          expenses.  On their Federal income tax return filed for 1993,               
          petitioners claimed a Schedule A deduction for petitioner's                 
          unreimbursed employee business expenses in the amount of $14,186,           
          including vocational supplies in the amount of $12,648, small               
          tools in the amount of $91, and textbooks in the amount of $54.             
               In the notice of deficiency for the tax year 1991,                     
          respondent disallowed petitioners' Schedule C deduction for car             
          and truck expense for lack of substantiation and for failure to             
          establish any amount expended was ordinary and necessary.                   
          Respondent disallowed petitioners' home office expense deduction            
          because it was not established that this expense was ordinary and           
          necessary for Mrs. Tesar's trade or business.  Respondent also              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011