John C. Vanderschraaf and Cornelia Vanderschraaf, et al. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Petitioners, Donald R. and Ella A. Lawrenz, resided in                 
          Corona Del Mar, California, at the time they filed their                    
          petitions.                                                                  
               On their respective Federal income tax returns for the years           
          in issue, petitioners claimed large losses and interest                     
          deductions relating to investments as limited partners in Boulder           
          Oil and Gas Associates (Boulder), Technology Oil and Gas                    
          Associates 1979 (Tech-1979), and Winfield Oil and Gas Associates            
          (Winfield).  Respondent disallowed these claimed losses and                 
          interest deductions, and petitioners filed the instant cases                
          contesting respondent's adjustments.                                        
               After a lengthy trial in the Krause test cases, we                     
          analyzed, primarily at the partnership level, the objective of              
          the particular partnerships involved in Krause.  We concluded               
          that the partnerships did not have the requisite profit objective           
          to support the losses claimed, and we sustained respondent's                
          disallowance of the claimed losses relating to the taxpayers’               
          investments in the partnerships.  Also, on the ground that the              
          underlying debt obligations did not constitute genuine debt, we             
          sustained respondent's disallowance of the claimed interest                 
          deductions relating thereto, and we imposed an increased interest           
          rate under section 6621(c).                                                 
               We did not, however, in the Krause test case opinion sustain           
          respondent's determinations under sections 6653(a)(1) and (2),              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011