Timothy L. and Jane Williams - Page 16

                                        - 16 -                                         

          $5,000 cash, $18,509 accounts receivable, and work in process                
          valued at $10,800, which they claim were transferred by WIS to               
          SPS at the time of SPS’s formation.  There is adequate evidence              
          in the record to confirm that WIS transferred $23,509 of cash and            
          accounts receivable to SPS in December 1991, and transferred an              
          additional $7,138 of accounts receivable at the beginning of                 
          1992, for a total investment of $30,647.                                     
               Petitioners claim the total value of the WIS contribution to            
          SPS as the basis of petitioner’s SPS stock, on the ground that               
          his wholly owned corporation was the source of all property                  
          contributed and the contributions were made on his behalf.                   
          Respondent, on the other hand, contends that petitioner acquired             
          no basis in SPS by reason of any transfers from WIS.  Although               
          respondent does not articulate the legal theory behind this                  
          position, the reason respondent gives is that petitioner failed              
          to demonstrate that he had any remaining basis in WIS at the                 
          times of the alleged transfers from WIS to SPS.                              
               Based largely on petitioner’s uncontroverted testimony, the             
          salient facts of the business reincorporation transaction may be             
          summarized as follows:  All the stock of SPS was issued in 1992              
          in exchange for property transferred by WIS during December 1991             
          and January 1992; petitioner’s business associates, Lewis and                
          Tate, received two-thirds of SPS’s stock; the transfers of                   
          property by WIS to SPS were made on petitioner’s behalf and not              
          made in satisfaction of any liabilities of WIS to Lewis and Tate.            



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011