- 24 - States, 769 F. Supp. 362 (M.D. Fla. 1991); Advest, Inc. v. Rader, 743 F. Supp. at 854. We concluded above that House of Babes transferred its assets without adequate consideration. Thus, respondent has established that House of Babes made a fraudulent conveyance under Florida law. B. Value of the Transferred Assets 1. Positions of the Parties Petitioners received cash and an interest in the buyers' note proportionate to their interest in House of Babes. The parties dispute the value of the note. Petitioners contend that Wiltzius' interest in the note (22.5 percent of $525,000 = $118,125) had a fair market value of $23,376.15 and that Waldorf's interest in the note (32.5 percent of $525,000 = $170,625) had a fair market value of $34,783. Respondent contends that the fair market value of each petitioner's interest in the note was his proportionate share of its full face value; i.e., $118,125 and $170,625. The fair market value of property is the price at which it would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts. United States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551 (1973); Estate of Hall v.Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011