- 9 - determined is a violation of their equal protection and due process rights because section 1034 favors wealthy taxpayers and discriminates on the basis of age; (2) the gain from the sale of their Mequon residence is "fictitious", resulting solely from inflation, and because there was no "real gain", there is no income subject to taxation; and (3) because the IRS does not recognize either nominal or real losses on the sale of a residence, gain from the sale of a residence cannot be taxed.4 Not surprisingly, 4 In their petition, petitioners state as follows: a. Taxing "gain" on the sale of our residence has no rational basis and violates the Equal Protection component of the 5th Amendment Due Process Clause because: (1) The tax invidiously discriminates in favor of wealthy homeowners and against those less fortunate. The wealthier homeowner, who trades up to a more expensive house, has no taxable gain. In contrast, the less affluent homeowner, who can't afford a more expensive house or must move into rental quarters, gets taxed merely because he can't come up with enough to buy anything or because he can't afford to buy a house of equivalent or greater price. (2) The tax also invidiously discriminates on the basis of age. Those who are 55 or older get an exclusion that no one else qualifies for. b. Taxing the "gain" violates the Due (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011