Kenneth R. and Carol L. Bauer - Page 7

                                        - 7 -7                                           

          fide debtor-creditor relationship exists is a question of fact              
          which ultimately requires a determination as to whether there was           
          a genuine intention to create a debt, with reasonable expectation           
          of repayment, and whether that intent comports with the economic            
          reality of creating a debtor-creditor relationship.  Litton Bus.            
          Sys., Inc. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 367, 377 (1973); see also               
          A.R. Lantz Co. v. United States, 424 F.2d 1330, 1334 (9th Cir.              
          1970); Fisher v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 905, 909 (1970).     There           
          is no standard test or formula for determining worthlessness                
          within a given taxable year; the determination depends upon the             
          particular facts and circumstances of the case.  Crown v.                   
          Commissioner, 77 T.C. 582, 598 (1981).  Generally, however, the             
          year of worthlessness is fixed by identifiable events that form             
          the basis of reasonable grounds for abandoning any hope of                  
          recovery.  United States v. S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.,            
          274 U.S. 398 (1927); American Offshore, Inc. v. Commissioner, 97            
          T.C. 579, 593 (1991); Crown v. Commissioner, supra.  Moreover, a            
          debt will generally be considered worthless only when it can be             
          reasonably expected that the debt is without possibility of                 
          future payment and legal action to enforce the debt would not               
          result in satisfaction.  Hawkins v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. 1069              
          (1953); sec. 1.166-2(b), Income Tax Regs.                                   
               Respondent asserts that petitioners are not entitled to a              
          bad debt deduction because:  (1) Petitioners have failed to                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011