- 12 - (1963), affd. 326 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1964), this Court stated that The elements of residence are the fact of abode and the intention of remaining, and the concept of residence is made up of a combination of acts and intention. Neither bodily presence alone nor intention alone will suffice to create a residence. * * * * * * * * * * The phrase "used by the taxpayer as his principal residence" means habitual use of the old residence as the principal residence. [Emphasis added.] The term "principal residence" means one's chief or main place of residence. Id. at 351. In general, the property sold must be the principal residence at the time it is sold. Thomas v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 206, 243 (1989); Aagaard v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 191, 202-203 (1971). Moreover, where part of the old residence sold was used as the taxpayer's principal residence and part was used for business purposes,2 only the portion of the gain allocable to the residential use is entitled to section 1034(a) nonrecognition. Richards v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-422; Beckwith v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1964-254; Grace v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1961-252. 2 Respondent argues that 20 The Point was a business asset and that petitioners never abandoned their business use at 20 The Point. Therefore, respondent contends that 20 The Point continued to be used as a business asset, and not as petitioners' principal residence. Because, as discussed later, we determine that 20 The Point was not petitioners' principal residence, we do not need to make an allocation of business and personal use at 20 The Point.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011