Bradley G. Bjelk - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          that the taxpayer had unreported income.  Gold Emporium, Inc. v.            
          Commissioner, 910 F.2d 1374, 1378 (7th Cir. 1990), affg. Malicki            
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-559.                                       
               Respondent has established, except with respect to 1993,               
          that petitioner was engaged in income-producing activities beyond           
          those that can be attributed to the income from identified                  
          sources to which petitioner has stipulated.  For taxable years              
          1988, 1989, and 1990, petitioner has stipulated that he operated            
          a business known as "The Crazy Horse Saloon" (the Crazy Horse               
          Saloon) and has admitted receiving income from this business in             
          each year, although in lesser amounts than respondent determined            
          as unreported income.                                                       
               With respect to 1991 and 1992, we are satisfied that the               
          evidence establishes that petitioner worked as manager of                   
          Jiordano's Pizza (Jiordano's) in Dekalb, Illinois.  Petitioner              
          denied that he ever worked at Jiordano's, even when confronted              
          with 1991 and 1992 DeKalb telephone directories listing him as              
          the manager of the establishment.  Moreover, respondent produced            
          a witness who was a cable television installer and who testified            
          that he made an installation at Jiordano's in 1991 or 1992, that            
          petitioner was listed as the contact person on the work order for           
          such installation, that petitioner and his sons were the only               
          persons present in the establishment and they entered areas not             
          normally accessible to customers, and that petitioner paid for              
          the installation.  In our view, petitioner's denial that he                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011