Bradley G. Bjelk - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          $20,000, which is an admission.  In connection with divorce                 
          proceedings on August 28, 1990, petitioner signed a separation              
          agreement representing that his annual income was $18,000 and               
          testified under oath that his current occupation was "machine               
          operator".  Yet on a 1990 Federal income tax return completed and           
          signed by petitioner and submitted in support of his position at            
          trial, he states that his gross income for 1990 was $5,535,                 
          consisting of the $1,035 in compensation from J&K Developers and            
          an estimated net profit of $4,500 from the Crazy Horse Saloon.10            
          Petitioner has not accounted for his admitted $20,000 or $18,000            
          annual income in 1990 or, with the possible exception of the                
          income from J&K Developers, any income from his work as a machine           
          operator.  We do not believe that gross income of $5,535 was                
          sufficient to meet petitioner's cost of living, even accepting              
          his contention that he lived with his mother during 1990.  We               
          note in this regard that petitioner assumed child support                   
          obligations of $100 per week, plus one-half of medical expenses,            
          as well as a $2,000 debt, in the divorce proceedings.  We                   
          conclude that no error has been demonstrated in respondent's                
          determination of $32,285 in unreported income for 1990 and                  
          accordingly sustain it.                                                     
          1991                                                                        

               10 Petitioner reported only a net profit figure on Schedule            
          C of the submitted 1990 return, without a supporting computation,           
          adding the notation that the figure represented one-half of his             
          net profits from the business in the preceding year.                        




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011