John L. Boettner, Jr. - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

               Petitioner filed a motion to vacate his criminal conviction            
          pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 2255 (1994).  The District Court                 
          denied petitioner's motion on March 31, 1994.  Petitioner                   
          appealed the District Court's judgment to the Court of Appeals              
          for the Fourth Circuit.  In an unpublished per curiam opinion               
          filed April 21, 1995, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit           
          affirmed the judgment of the District Court.  On June 14, 1995,             
          the Court of Appeals entered its judgment affirming the District            
          Court.                                                                      
               For the taxable year 1985, respondent determined petitioner            
          received $4,120 of unreported income.2  Respondent determined a             
          deficiency in, and additions to, petitioner's Federal income tax            
          for the taxable year 1985 as follows:                                       
                         Additions to Tax                                             
          Deficiency     Sec. 6653(b)(1)           Sec. 6653(b)(2)                    
          $1,577         $5,017              50 percent of the interest               
                                             due on $1,577                            
               Petitioner resided in St. Michaels, Maryland, at the time he           
          petitioned this Court to redetermine respondent's determination             
          of a deficiency in his income tax and additions to tax as set               
          forth above.  Respondent's answer and amended answer included               


               2    Respondent's motion is for partial summary judgment               
          with respect to whether petitioner is estopped to dispute that              
          there is an underpayment in his income tax for 1985 and that part           
          of the underpayment is due to civil fraud pursuant to sec.                  
          6653(b).  The amount of the underlying deficiency for 1985                  
          remains to be adjudicated.                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011