Alvin Victor Bracey - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          various entries on his return.  Petitioner misunderstands, and              
          does not meet, the requirement of section 6662(d)(2)(B), which is           
          that disclosures be on the return or a statement attached                   
          thereto.  Petitioner made no such disclosure.  See sec. 1.6661-             
          4(a), Income Tax Regs.  Accordingly, there is no reduction in the           
          understatement.                                                             
               The question of whether there is a substantial                         
          understatement of income tax thus depends upon the amount of the            
          understatement, which will be addressed in the Rule 155                     
          computation.  The understatement shall not include any portion of           
          the underpayment for which we have herein found there was                   
          reasonable cause under section 6664(c)(1).                                  





               We have considered all other arguments made by petitioner              
          and found them to be either irrelevant or without merit.                    
               To reflect the foregoing and concessions,                              
                                                Decision will be entered              
                                           under Rule 155.                            













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  

Last modified: May 25, 2011