- 14 - consistently retain real estate agents to assist in the sale of its properties. Mr. McKelvey also told respondent's agent during the audit that most of the persons who had purchased any of petitioner's properties had previously been tenants and he knew them to be good payors so that it required very little effort to collect payments from them after the purchase. Furthermore, Mr. McKelvey told the agent that petitioner's operating expenses related to the rental properties. In the subject notice of deficiency, respondent determined that during each of the years in issue, petitioner was a personal holding company, as defined by section 542. The notice of deficiency states as follows: Since over 50 [sic] percent of your adjusted ordinary gross income reported for the taxable years 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994 was from dividends, rents and interest, you qualified as a personal holding company as defined by Section 542 of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, you were subject to the personal holding company tax imposed by Section 541 of the Code. Respondent also disallowed a portion of the deductions claimed by petitioner for the years 1992 and 1993 on the ground that the total deductions claimed for each of those taxable years exceeded the income from petitioner's passivePage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011