Consolidated Manufacturing, Inc., M. P. Long Living Trust, Merl Philip Long, Trustee, Tax Matters Person - Page 87

                                        -87-                                          
               inventory as may be available, such as specific                        
               purchases or sales by the taxpayer or others in                        
               reasonable volume and made in good faith, or                           
               compensation paid for cancellation of contracts for                    
               purchase commitments. * * *                                            
               The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the               
          term "current bid price" used in section 1.471-4(a), Income Tax             
          Regs., is synonymous with the "replacement cost, that is, the               
          price the taxpayer would have to pay on the open market to                  
          purchase or reproduce the inventory items."  Thor Power Tool Co.            
          v. Commissioner, supra at 534.  The current bid price is to be              
          determined based on prevailing prices in the market in which the            
          taxpayer actually participates.  D. Loveman & Son Export Corp. v.           
          Commissioner, 34 T.C. 776, 799 (1960), affd. 296 F.2d 732 (6th              
          Cir. 1961); Bamert v. Commissioner, supra at 1100.                          
               Based on our examination of the entire record before us, we            
          find that Consolidated acquired its customer cores under                    
          ordinary, and not extraordinary, circumstances.  In acquiring               
          customer cores, Consolidated participated in the marketplace in             
          which it purchased those cores from its customers, and not in the           
          marketplace in which it purchased core supplier cores from core             
          suppliers.  We further find that petitioner has failed to                   
          persuade us either that the marketplace in which Consolidated               
          acquired customer cores from its customers is not an open market            
          in which Consolidated participated within the meaning of section            
          1.471-4(b), Income Tax Regs., or that Consolidated did not                  
          acquire its customer cores in an open market.  On the instant               




Page:  Previous  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011