Estate of Suzanne W. Cullison, Deceased, J. Greg Cullison, Personal Representative - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         

          do not) petitioner's offered testimony concerning the                       
          grandchildren's alleged signing of the annuity agreement in late            
          1988, there would only, at best, have been an executory agreement           
          on decedent's part to transfer her land to them.  An executory              
          agreement to sell is not a sale.  See Armstrong v. Commissioner,            
          6 T.C. 1166, 1173-1174 (1946), affd. per curiam 162 F.2d 199 (3d            
          Cir. 1947).  Moreover, petitioner's own petition asserted that              
          the transaction occurred on or about August 29, 1989, not in late           
          1988, as petitioner now contends.  We hold that decedent's                  
          transfer of the land in connection with the private annuity                 
          transaction occurred on August 29, 1989, after the effective date           
          of section 7520.5  See sec. 25.2511-2, Gift Tax Regs. (providing            
          that for gift tax purposes a gift is made on the date upon which            


               5  We would note that if the transaction had taken place in            
          late 1988, as petitioner contends, the annuity then should have             
          been valued under the applicable estate and gift tax regulations            
          in effect for transfers made after Nov. 30, 1983, but before May            
          1, 1989.  See T.D. 7955, 1984-1 C.B. 40; sec. 20.2031-7A(d)(6)              
          (Table A), Estate Tax Regs.; sec. 25.2512-5A(d)(1)(i) and (ii),             
          (2)(i), (6), Gift Tax Regs.  If decedent's accountant had valued            
          decedent's annuity pursuant to the pertinent actuarial table (see           
          Table A in sec. 20.2031-7A(d)(6), Estate Tax Regs.) provided                
          under the regulations in effect in late 1988, then he presumably            
          would have computed a value for the annuity of at most                      
          $1,305,866.20 ($311,165 multiplied by 4.1967).  That                        
          $1,305,866.20 value is even lower than the $1,360,724 value                 
          respondent has computed for the annuity, pursuant to sec. 7520,             
          in the Mar. 13, 1996, notice of deficiency.  Further, decedent's            
          tax advisers should have been aware of the estate and gift tax              
          regulations in effect in 1988, as those regulations (including              
          Table A) were originally issued in 1984, well before the time               
          when decedent and they were planning the annuity transaction.               
          See T.D. 7955, 1984-1 C.B. at 41, 86-87.                                    




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011