- 25 - to her grandchildren substantially exceeded the $1,360,724 value of the annuity. Petitioner, nevertheless, asserts that decedent's transfer of the land is not subject to gift tax, because the transaction qualifies as a sale in the ordinary course of business under section 25.2512-8, Gift Tax Regs. We disagree. Transactions between family members are subject to special scrutiny. Harwood v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. at 258. Also, one of the major purposes of the gift tax is to prevent an avoidance of estate tax by an inter vivos transfer of property. See Carson v. Commissioner, 641 F.2d at 866 n.6. The record reflects that no arm's-length bargaining took place between decedent and her grandchildren. Indeed, the private annuity transaction was structured by decedent's attorney and accountant and was devised as a substitute for decedent's earlier planned testamentary disposition of her land to certain of her grandchildren. We hold that the private annuity transaction between decedent and her grandchildren is not a transaction in the ordinary course of business within the meaning of section 25.2512-8, Gift Tax Regs. See Harwood v. Commissioner, supra at 257-258. In conclusion, decedent's August 1989 sale of her farmland to her grandchildren is subject to gift tax, as the value of thePage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011