- 25 - will correspond to the amount or portion of the value of the investment unit that is allocated to the options. Secs. 1273(b)(2), 1273(c)(2), 1275(a)(2)(B). At trial and on brief, the parties herein agree that OID is to be associated with the $26 million loan that was received from FNBB to the extent that the options (to acquire stock in CC Holdings) that were granted to FNBB had any ascertainable value as of the date petitioner received the loan and the options were issued to FNBB.3 The parties, however, disagree as to the value of the options, and thus they disagree as to the existence and amount of any OID associated with the loan. Petitioner values the options at or exceeding $2.6 million and argues that it should be entitled to deduct at least $2.6 million as OID over the separate terms of the 3 loans that made up the total $26 million loan. Respondent argues that no OID was associated with the $26 million loan, and, alternatively, if OID was incurred, the amount thereof was no more than $31,850. The evidence establishes, and the parties agree, that the options to acquire stock in CC Holdings that were granted to FNBB were issued “at the money” with a $500 per share exercise price. 3 As indicated, after the LBO, petitioner became liable for the debts of CC Acquisition. For convenience, in discussing the OID issue, we substitute petitioner for CC Acquisition as the debtor on the loan.Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011