Davenport Recycling Associates, Sam Winer, Tax Matters Partner - Page 56

                                       - 56 -                                         
          where State law is consistent with the principle of implied                 
          ratification.  New York's partnership law, the law governing the            
          Davenport partnership agreement, specifically indicates that the            
          law of agency applies to partnerships.  N.Y. Partnership Law sec.           
          4 (McKinney 1988).  Inasmuch as ratification9 is an agency                  
          concept, it applies here.  Under New York law, ratification by              
          implication may be found to exist where a principal fails to                
          disaffirm the action of an agent within a reasonable time.  IBJ             
          Schroder Bank & Trust Co. v. Resolution Trust Corporation, 26               
          F.3d 370, 375 (2d Cir. 1994).                                               
               Moreover, in Mishawaka, we found evidence that persons who             
          were qualified to file the petition had authorized or consented             
          to the filing of the petition by Finkelman.  Under the doctrine             
          of ratification, such a petition was an imperfect petition which            
          was then impliedly ratified by the other partners when they                 
          failed to protest Finkelman's filing of the petition.  In earlier           
          cases, we had allowed partners to perfect an imperfect petition             
          in a TEFRA case where there was evidence that the partners had              
          authorized the filing of the petition and wanted this Court to              
          find jurisdiction.  Montana Sapphire Associates. Ltd. v.                    


          9    A ratification occurs when the benefits of the purportedly             
          unauthorized acts are accepted with full knowledge of the facts             
          under circumstances demonstrating an intent to adopt the                    
          unauthorized arrangement.  In re Securities Group, 926 F.2d 1051,           
          1055 (11th Cir. 1991) (citing Monarch Ins. Co. v. Insurance Corp.           
          of Ireland, Ltd., 835 F.2d 32, 36 (2d Cir. 1987)).                          





Page:  Previous  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011