Estate of Artemus D. Davis, Deceased, Robert D. Davis, Personal Representative - Page 27

                                       - 27 -                                         
                    Second, and more importantly, when the actual facts               
              do not suggest that the shareholders intended to                        
              liquidate the corporation, this Court has refused to                    
              assume that the hypothetical buyer would do so.  Estate                 
              of Ford v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-580, 66 T.C.M.                 
              (CCH) 1507, 1517 (1993), aff'd, 53 F.3d 924 (8th Cir.                   
              1995); Estate of Bennett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                    
              1993-34, 65 T.C.M. (CCH) 1816, 1825 (1993).  Here,                      
              petitioner stipulated that no liquidation was                           
              contemplated at the time of the subject gifts.                          
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    Petitioner will no doubt argue that the Tax Court                 
              has not unequivocally stated that the potential capital                 
              gains taxes cannot be considered as a legal matter.                     
              Respondent recognizes that valuation is inherently a                    
              factual consideration.  Nevertheless, this Court has                    
              consistently held that when liquidation is speculative,                 
              projected capital gains taxes do not reduce value, Ward                 
              v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 78, 104 (1986); Estate of Luton                
              v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-539; Estate of Ford v.                 
              Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-580; and that unforeseen                  
              future events cannot affect value, Messing v.                           
              Commissioner, 48 T.C. 502, 509 (1967); Mandelbaum v.                    
              Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-255.  The only proper                     
              construction of this conclusory language is that                        
              consideration of these speculative future events,                       
              including capital gains taxes, is improper as a legal                   
              matter. [Fn. ref. omitted.]                                             
              We reject respondent's position that, as a matter of law, no            
          discount or adjustment attributable to ADDI&C's built-in capital            
          gains tax is allowable in the instant case.  Indeed, it appears             
          that even respondent abandons, or at least contradicts, that                
          position when respondent acknowledges in respondent's answering             
          brief that                                                                  
              if a sale or liquidation of ADDI&C's assets was in fact                 
              contemplated on the valuation date or if, in fact,                      
              avoidance of a corporate level capital gains tax was not                
              available, some reduction in value would be appropriate.                
              * * * [Emphasis added.]                                                 





Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011