- 5 - their car and truck expenses, because they are unsubstantiated commuting expenses. Discussion Telephone Expenses Petitioners argue that in 1994 their home telephone was strictly for business use. According to petitioner, he had some business partners, including one in Japan, who needed immediate access to him by fax with respect to some litigation. Petitioner testified that he connected a computer to his telephone line for the entire year so it could receive any fax that his business associates might send to him concerning the litigation. Petitioner testified that the amounts paid for telephone service in 1994 are shown on a computer printout he presented at trial. The actual telephone bills are in storage with his attorneys and unavailable, explained petitioner. Respondent objects to the admission of the computer printout, arguing that it lacks relevance. We disagree, and find the document to be relevant to the issues of whether petitioners made expenditures for telephone service and the amount expended. Our resolution of this evidentiary issue does not, however, dispose of the issue of the deductibility of the expenses. Personal, living, and family expenses are not generally deductible. Sec. 262(a). In the case of an individual, the basic charge for the first telephone line provided to anyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011