- 12 - expense the unsubstantiated portion of the truck mileage related to the alleged real estate activity. As substantiation for petitioner's remaining 29,001-mile business use of the truck, for his work with Ro-Tile, he provided two calendars for the year 1994.6 Petitioner testified that he kept one calendar "that was thrown into the car, that I would run around in the car with"7 and one at home "on the wall". For days when he expected to travel to Ro-Tile, a 162-mile round trip, petitioner testified that he made a notation of the letters "RT" on the calendars. Petitioner said that sometimes he failed to make notations in the calendar that he kept at home, and indeed there are many fewer "RT" notations on that calendar than on the one he carried with him in the "car". Petitioner testified that he made the "RT" notations in advance, because "I tried to plan my month". There are crossed out "RT" notations that represent days he thought he was going to Ro-Tile but for some reason did not, according to petitioner. Petitioner made 162 "RT" notations (that were not crossed out) on his "car" calendar. 6Respondent notes a relevance objection to these stipulated items. We find them, however, clearly relevant to whether petitioner has substantiated the business use of his truck under sec. 274(d). 7In the context of the other evidence in this case, we assume petitioner was referring to his pickup truck when he testified that the calendar was kept in his "car".Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011