- 2 - denying that (1) H had an underpayment of tax for each of the years in issue and (2) this underpayment was due to fraud. 1. Held: Ps’ motion for leave to file an amended reply will be granted. Rule 41(a) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice & Procedure. 2. Held, further, H is collaterally estopped from denying that (1) H had an underpayment of tax for each year in issue and (2) this underpayment was due to fraud. R’s summary judgment motion will be granted to the extent of this collateral estoppel; in all other respects, R’s summary judgment motion will be denied. Rule 121 of the Tax Court Rules of Practice & Procedure. Moshe Schuldinger, for petitioners. Alan R. Peregoy, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION CHABOT, Judge: The instant case is before us on petitioners’ motion under Rule 411 for leave to file an amended reply and on respondent’s motion under Rule 121 for summary judgment. Background--Procedure 1. Notice of Deficiency; Petition Respondent determined deficiencies in Federal individual income tax and additions to tax under sections 6653(b)(1)2 1 Unless indicated otherwise, all Rule References are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 Unless indicated otherwise, all section references are (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011