Anthony and Gloria Donnora - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          of petitioners’ responding to the affirmative allegations of                
          fraud in the answer, and that this was only 4 days before the               
          reply was filed.  Respondent argues from this that petitioners’             
          failure to deny the affirmative allegations was not an                      
          inadvertent mistake.  Respondent also asserts that, if                      
          petitioners are allowed to amend their reply, and if the Court              
          then denies respondent’s summary judgment motion, then discovery            
          will be required.  Respondent argues that so little time remained           
          for discovery before the then-impending trial date that                     
          respondent will be prejudiced if petitioners are allowed to amend           
          their reply.                                                                
               We agree with petitioners that they should be allowed to               
          file an amended reply.                                                      
               The first three sentences of Rule 41(a), set forth supra               
          note 8, “are derived from FRCP 15(a), and reflect a liberal                 
          attitude toward amendment of pleadings.”  Explanatory Note to               
          Rule 41(a), 60 T.C. 1089.  This Court has looked to cases decided           
          under rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for                
          guidance on the interpretation of Rule 41(a).  Kramer v.                    
          Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1081, 1084-1085 (1987).  Rule 15(a) of the            
          Federal Rules of Civil Procedure also states that leave to amend            
          “shall be freely given when justice so requires.”  Rule 15(a) of            
          the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure reflects a generous attitude           
          toward amendment; however, the leave petitioners seek is not a              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011