- 5 - basis in its USMP stock. Sec. 165(g)(3). To prevail, petitioner must establish that its USMP stock ceased to have both "liquidating value" and "potential value" during the year in which the worthlessness is claimed. Austin Co. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 955, 970 (1979); Steadman v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 369, 376 (1968), affd. 424 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1970); Morton v. Commissioner, 38 B.T.A. 1270, 1278 (1938), affd. 112 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1940). A corporation does not have a liquidation value if the value of its liabilities exceeds the value of its assets. Steadman v. Commissioner, supra at 376-377. On the day after the sale, USMP reported a net worth of $29,501. This figure, however, included a reduction for petitioner's waiver of $110,000 in current liabilities. Thus, before the sale, USMP had a negative net worth of $80,499. Therefore, we conclude that in 1984 when petitioner sold and claimed a deduction relating to its USMP stock, such stock had no liquidating value. A loss of potential value is ordinarily established by the occurrence of an "identifiable event" that destroys any reasonable expectation that the assets will exceed the liabilities in the future. Id. at 376. An identifiable event includes the sale of property. See, e.g., United States v. S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co., 274 U.S. 398, 401 (1927); Proesel v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 992, 1005 (1981). Respondent contends that at the time of the sale USMP had potential value because thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011