Carl J. Fabry and Patricia P. Fabry - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         

               Since the record of the lawsuit that is before us does not             
          include any claim for personal injuries within the meaning of               
          section 104(a)(2), we do not believe that the claim for injury to           
          business reputation was on account of personal injuries, as that            
          term is used in section 104(a)(2).  Indeed, the stipulation on              
          its face excepts personal injury from its coverage.                         
                    3.  Conclusion                                                    
               The $500,000 payment is allocable to business reputation               
          damages.  Nevertheless, petitioners have failed to prove that the           
          $500,000 payment was received on account of “personal injuries”,            
          as that term is used in section 104(a)(2).                                  
          IV.  Conclusion                                                             
               Petitioners have shown no grounds to exclude the $500,000              
          payment from gross income.  Respondent’s determination of a                 
          deficiency is sustained to the extent attributable to                       
          petitioners' omission of the $500,000 payment from gross income.            

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  

Last modified: May 25, 2011