Carolyn M. Fankhanel - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          deemed admitted by petitioner pursuant to Rule 90; those matters            
          also are incorporated herein by this reference.                             
          Petition                                                                    
               At the time petitioner filed the petition in this case, she            
          resided in Bristol, West Virginia.                                          
          Failure to File                                                             
               Petitioner failed to file Federal income tax returns for the           
          11 taxable (calendar) years in issue (1983 through 1993).                   
          Introduction to Petitioner’s Income Producing Activities                    
               Petitioner lived in Colorado from 1978 until November 1989,            
          when she moved to Florida.  Petitioner obtained a Colorado real             
          estate salesperson’s license in 1978 and worked for various real            
          estate agents in Colorado from then until 1984, when she obtained           
          a Colorado real estate broker’s license.  She then formed her own           
          real estate company, Fankhanel and Associates, which employed two           
          to four persons and provided petitioner with an income until she            
          left Colorado in 1989.  During the time she lived in Colorado,              
          petitioner also owned several pieces of rental real estate,                 
          engaged in real estate development, and was a partner in a plant            
          store.  Petitioner sold her Colorado real properties when she               
          left Colorado.                                                              


          1(...continued)                                                             
          Accordingly, we must conclude that petitioner has conceded                  
          respondent’s proposed findings of fact as correct except to the             
          extent that petitioner’s opening brief contains proposed findings           
          clearly inconsistent therewith.  See, e.g., Estate of Freeman v.            
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-372.                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011