Carolyn M. Fankhanel - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          support from the parent having custody for a greater part of the            
          year, if he receives more than half of his support from one or              
          both of his parents and is in the custody of his parents for over           
          half the year.  The amendment did eliminate the following                   
          exception to the general rule.  Prior to amendment, section                 
          152(e)(2)(B) provided that the noncustodial parent was treated as           
          having provided over one-half of the child’s support if (1) he or           
          she provided $1,200 or more during the year for support of the              
          child and (2) the custodial parent failed to “clearly establish”            
          that he or she provided more for the child’s support than the               
          noncustodial parent.                                                        
               In the case of a dependent who is a child of the taxpayer,             
          the additional exemption allowed by section 151(c)(1)(B) is                 
          allowed only if the child:  "(i) has not attained the age of 19             
          at the close of the calendar year in which the taxable year of              
          the taxpayer begins, or (ii) is a student."4                                
               C.  Syme                                                               
               Petitioner claims an additional personal exemption deduction           
          for Syme for 1983 and 1984.  Respondent has determined that                 
          petitioner is not entitled to a dependency exemption for Syme for           
          those years because Syme usually lived in the actual care and               


          4    In 1988, Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988,              
          Pub. L. 100-647, sec. 6010(a), 102 Stat. 3691, added “who has not           
          attained the age of 24 at the close of such calendar year” in               
          clause (c)(1)(B)(ii), effective for tax years beginning after               
          1988.  That change has no consequence to this case.                         




Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011