Michael Friedman and Madeline Friedman - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         

          but believed that the inherent risks of litigation and other                
          factors involved supported the resolution on the terms offered.             
          However, on April 11, 1995, at a hearing, the bankruptcy court              
          empowered the trustee to settle and compromise his claims against           
          all of the defendants, including petitioners, for the sum of $2.2           
          million to be paid by E&M Investments Co.5  Subsequently, the               
          trustee was authorized to distribute the foregoing proceeds to              
          pay certain expenses and creditors.                                         
               On November 30, 1995, the bankruptcy trustee filed a "Final            
          Report" (Final Report) with the bankruptcy court.  The report               
          states:                                                                     
                    All property of the estate, except that claimed as                
               exempt by the debtor, without objection, or determined                 
               by the [bankruptcy] Court as exempt, has been                          
               inventoried, collected and liquidated, or abandoned.                   
               Any property not heretofore abandoned by the trustee is                
               now abandoned.                                                         
                    All claims have been examined and objections have been            
               resolved.  * * *                                                       

               Subsequently, on July 15, 1996, based on the trustee's Final           
          Report, the bankruptcy court issued an order which discharged the           
          trustee from his responsibilities, and the chapter 7 proceeding             
          involving New Manchester was adjudged closed.                               

               5Old Manchester's corporate successor and petitioners'                 
          wholly owned company.  See supra p. 5.                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011