Ramon A. Garcia and Bertha E. Garcia - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
             Respondent calculated the aggregate deemed distribution                  
             for 1991, $66,755.32, as follows:                                        

                      Loan         Balance as ofBalance as of1991 AccruedBalance as ofTotal        
               Date Principal1991 Loans12/31/90  12/31/91 Interest 12/31/91 Distribution  
              2/03/86$15,000.00                                 $26,469.16             
              5/01/8612,000.00                                  9,720.53               
              8/15/8611,760.00                                  19,751.88              
              1/15/8710,000.00       $14,482.98$15,986.50$1,503.52                      
              2/15/874,000.00        5,793.19 6,394.60  601.41                         
              2/15/8810,000.00       13,120.8714,482.98 1,362.11                       
              8/15/885,000.00        6,244.31 6,892.56  648.25                         
              1/31/906,000.00        6,461.34 7,132.11  670.77                         
              4/16/9018,000.00       18,911.2520,874.18 1,962.93                       
              1/01/911,675.86$1,676.00        1,804.87  128.87                         
              5/22/912,151.47 2,151.00        2,259.89  108.89                         
              3/24/922,500.00                                                          
              6/17/92   5,000.00 __________ _________ __________                      
                             3,827.00                  6,986.7555,941.57$66,755.32    
                  1The difference between the principal amounts of the loans          
             petitioner received in 1991 and the amounts respondent includes in the   
             deemed distribution for the year is presumably attributable to           
             rounding.                                                                

                  We note that in calculating the unpaid balance of the               
             1986 loans as of December 31, 1991, respondent applied the               
             $8,545 payment that petitioner made on April 11, 1989, to                
             the outstanding balance of the May 1, 1986, loan as of the               
             date of the payment.  We also note that, in computing the                
             revised deficiency, respondent did not treat the principal               
             amounts of the loans petitioner received in 1987, 1988, or               
             1992 as taxable distributions in either of the years at                  
             issue.                                                                   













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011