Ramon A. Garcia and Bertha E. Garcia - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
                  Regs., 60 Fed. Reg. 66234, 66236 (Dec. 21, 1995)                    
                  (emphasis added).]                                                  

                  Under this proposed regulation, petitioners contend,                
             the loans must be treated as distributions at the time                   
             petitioner first failed to make a quarterly installment                  
             payment.  They further contend that such failure occurred                
             in "1987, at the latest."                                                
                  We note at the outset that the above proposed                       
             regulation has not been finalized.  Moreover, even if the                
             proposed regulation were final, it would not, by its terms,              
             apply to the 1986 loans.  See sec. 1.72(p)-1, Q&A-19,                    
             Proposed Income Tax Regs. 63 Fed. Reg. 42, 47 (Jan. 2,                   
             1998) (regulation applies to "loans made on or after the                 
             date that is three months after the date of publication of               
             the final regulations in the Federal Register.")  In any                 
             event, as discussed below, we reject petitioners' threshold              
             contention that section 72(p)(2)(C) as added to the Code by              
             the 1986 Act is applicable to the 1986 loans.  Therefore,                
             we need not address petitioners' contention regarding the                
             effect of the proposed regulation.                                       












Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011