Theodore Edward Hagadone - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               In a statutory notice of deficiency dated February 27, 1997,           
          respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income           
          tax for 1994 in the amount of $3,934.                                       
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether respondent is                
          bound by the contents of a report issued by his Problem                     
          Resolution Officer subsequent to the issuance of the statutory              
          notice of deficiency; and (2) whether this Court has jurisdiction           
          to consider petitioner's claim for an abatement of interest.                
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and attached exhibits are incorporated             
          herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in Hereford,                  
          Arizona, on the date the petition was filed in this case.                   
               Petitioner timely filed his Federal income tax return for              
          1994 on which he correctly reported his filing status as single.            
               In the statutory notice of deficiency in this case                     
          respondent determined that petitioner received but failed to                
          report on his 1994 return the following amounts of income:                  
               Pensions and annuities                  $2,359                         
               IRA distributions                       3,216                          
               Taxable Social Security benefits        7,188                          
               Gambling income                         26                             
               With respect to the unreported pension and annuity income              
          which petitioner received from the Office of Personnel Management           
          Retirement Programs (the OPM Retirement Program), respondent                
          concedes that petitioner is entitled to exclude from his gross              
          income any portion of the amount received which is attributable             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011