Theodore Edward Hagadone - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          agreement under the provisions of section 7121.4  Holland v.                
          Commissioner, 70 T.C. 1046, 1048-1049 (1978), affd. 622 F.2d 95             
          (4th Cir. 1980); Hudock v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 351, 362 (1975).           
          The statutory procedure is ordinarily the exclusive method by               
          which the Commissioner may be finally and conclusively bound.               
          Botany Worsted Mills v. United States, 278 U.S. 282, 288 (1929);            
          Estate of Meyer v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 69, 70-71 (1972).  "The            
          very fact that Congress has provided a way in which the Internal            
          Revenue Department may bind itself, precludes the possibility of            
          its being bound by some other procedure."  Knapp-Monarch Co. v.             
          Commissioner, 139 F.2d 863, 864 (8th Cir. 1944), affg. 1 T.C. 59            
          (1942).                                                                     
               It is also well established that the Commissioner is not               
          bound by the unauthorized and erroneous actions of his employees            
          where the law dictates a different result.  See Keystone Auto.              
          Club Cas. Co. v. Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 291 (1939), as                     
          supplemented 42 B.T.A. 356 (1940), affd. 122 F.2d 886 (3d Cir.              
          1941); see also Bagnell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-378 (and           
          cases cited therein).  We have reviewed the April 9, 1997, report           
          and find that it erroneously used "head of household" filing                
          status to compute petitioner's tax liability.                               



          4         Sec. 7121(b) provides an exception to this rule upon a            
          showing of fraud, or malfeasance or misrepresentation of a                  
          material fact.                                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011