- 5 - Petitioner's 1994 income tax return reported total income of $21,575.12, consisting of wages, $21,515.13, and interest income, $59.99.4 However, under Adjustments to Income on page 1 of Form 1040, petitioner made a material alteration to the form by listing his salary and wage income of $21,515.13 as a deduction, resulting in reported adjusted gross income of $59.99. Adjacent to his improvised adjustment, petitioner whited out the preprinted line descriptions and typed in "Compensation exclusion, 26 CFR ('39)9.22(b) Knowlton vs Moore 178 U.S. 41 Right to Labor is nontaxable Murdoch vs Penn. 319 U.S. 105 Coppage vs. Kan. 236 U.S. 1". Petitioner also claimed the standard deduction of $3,800 and one personal exemption of $2,450. The return shows a zero total tax liability, Federal income tax withheld of $1,006.70, and an overpayment of $1,006.70. Petitioner signed his 1994 Federal income tax return and stamped above his signature "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207".5 4 Attached to petitioner's 1994 return were three Forms W-2, from the following employers reporting the following wages: (1) Clark Refining and Marketing, Inc., $18,764.34; (2) Prudential Ins. Co. of America, $609.85; and (3) Staffing Solutions, Inc., $2,140.94. Also attached to the return was a Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., from Prudential Ins. Co. of America reporting a gross distribution of $84.43 from petitioner's retirement plan, with $4.33 being taxable. 5 At trial, counsel for respondent stated "Respondent did not accept this form for filing due to the qualification beneath his signature and due to the material alterations." In Sloan v. (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011