Dean Scott Hodge - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          he received wages in compensation for his services.  Petitioner             
          further admitted at trial that he received, for 1994, wages of              
          $21,513 in compensation for his services, interest income of $55,           
          taxable IRA distribution of $4, and a State income tax refund of            
          $337.  Petitioner contends, however, that this income is not                
          subject to Federal income taxation because the words "income" and           
          "U.S. Individual" are not defined in the Internal Revenue Code,             
          and there is no explanation in the Internal Revenue Code of who             
          is subject to Federal income taxes.  Petitioner also asserts a              
          series of disjointed and unsupported tax protester arguments such           
          as "the income tax is voluntary", "compensation is an direct item           
          of income not taxable by the federal government", "the 16th                 
          amendment and the income tax is limited to indirect excise                  
          taxes", and so forth.  Petitioner did not challenge the amounts             
          of income determined by respondent and made no claim to                     
          deductions, exemptions, or credits.7                                        
               All of the arguments advanced by petitioner are completely             
          lacking in factual and legal foundation and constitute a textbook           
          case of a protest of the Federal tax laws.  These types of tax              
          protester arguments have been heard on numerous occasions by this           

          7                                                                           
               Even though petitioner took the position that none of his              
          income was taxable, in his petition, he made no claim for an                
          overpayment of taxes for 1992 in excess of the amount abated by             
          respondent.  As noted earlier, the only income adjustment for               
          1992 is the $2,040.63 for recovery of the $574 tax abatement by             
          respondent based on petitioner's September 1992 refund claim.               
          See supra note 3.                                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011