Anita C. Human - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         

               We recently addressed special factors in this context in               
          Cozean v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 227 (1997).  In Cozean, we                 
          recognized that for the "limited availability of qualified                  
          attorneys" to qualify as a special factor allowing an increase in           
          the statutory maximum, "there must be a limited availability of             
          attorneys who possess distinctive knowledge or a specialized                
          skill needful to the particular litigation in question, as                  
          opposed to an extraordinary level of general lawyerly knowledge."           
          Id. at 232 (citing Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 572                   
          (1988)).  In providing examples of attorneys possessing                     
          distinctive knowledge or specialized skill, the Supreme Court               
          listed patent attorneys and attorneys with knowledge of foreign             
          language or law.  Pierce v. Underwood, supra at 572.                        
               We have further noted that "the work and ability of counsel,           
          the results obtained, and the customary fees and awards in other            
          cases should not be considered for the purpose of determining               
          whether an increased award is warranted."  Cozean v.                        
          Commissioner, supra at 232-233 (citing Pierce v. Underwood, supra           
          at 573).                                                                    
               In accordance with the above, we do not regard as a special            
          factor the substantive tax expertise of Beeler nor the prevailing           
          local rates of tax attorneys with similar credentials.  Although            
          petitioner required the services of a competent tax attorney, she           
          has failed to establish that there was a limited availability of            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011