- 7 - Service began an examination of petitioner's 1990-93 tax years. On the basis of this examination, the agent reconstructed petitioner's income from his cattle-breeding operations for years 1990-93 by combining a bank deposit analysis of the Third National Bank account held by petitioner and his wife with an analysis of nondeposited cash sales of cattle. The parties stipulated that the following represents a proper calculation of the unreported gross receipts received by petitioner from his cattle-breeding operation during the years in issue: 1990 1991 1992 1993 Total deposits to bank account $55,370.14 $151,571.06 $80,084.43 $110,639.83 Less: nonincome deposits 30,527.77 56,150.95 37,417.52 71,427.61 Net income deposits 24,842.37 95,420.11 42,666.91 39,212.22 Add: receipts from cattle sales not deposited 39,810.90 33,850.00 1,000.00 13,500.00 Unreported gross receipts 64,653.27 129,270.11 43,666.91 52,712.22 Petitioner, however, maintains that a portion of each year's "unreported gross receipts" produced from his cattle-breeding operation represents amounts he received on behalf of others with respect to their interests in the cattle sold. In this regard, petitioner claims that he received the following amounts on behalf of the Vanderhaydens and Mr. Stennett (as well as others), whichPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011