- 3 - All section references, unless otherwise specified, are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue. All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. By order, these cases were consolidated for trial, briefing, and opinion. They were submitted fully stipulated. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the Koramba partnerships' soil and water conservation expenditures (conservation expenditures) incurred after December 31, 1986, with respect to land located outside the United States can qualify for deductibility under section 175. Background Koramba No. 1 was organized as a general partnership under the laws of Australia. At the time each of the Koramba No. 1 petitions was filed, the partnership had its principal place of business at Koramba, Boomi, New South Wales, Australia. Koramba No. 2 was organized as a general partnership under the laws of Australia. At the time each of the Koramba No. 2 petitions was filed, the partnership had its principal place of business at Koramba, Boomi, New South Wales, Australia. At all relevant times, Dean Phillips (Phillips) has been the tax matters partner of Koramba No. 1 and Koramba No. 2 (partnerships). Phillips' address at the time the petitions werePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011