Koramba Farmers & Graziers No. 1, Dean Phillips, Tax Matters Partner, et al. - Page 7

                                                                                - 7 -                                                                                      

                                                                           Discussion                                                                                      
                              The relevant provisions of section 175 are as follows:                                                                                       
                              SEC. 175.  SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION EXPENDITURES.                                                                                         
                                        (a)  In general.--A taxpayer engaged in the business of                                                                            
                              farming may treat expenditures which are paid or incurred by                                                                                 
                              him during the taxable year for the purpose of soil or water                                                                                 
                              conservation in respect of land used in farming, or for the                                                                                  
                              prevention of erosion of land used in farming, as expenses                                                                                   
                              which are not chargeable to capital account.  The                                                                                            
                              expenditures so treated shall be allowed as a deduction.                                                                                     
                                                  **        *         *         *         *         *         *                                                            
                                        (c)  Definitions.--For purposes of subsection(a)--                                                                                 
                                                  *         *         *         *         *         *         *                                                            
                                                  (3)  Additional limitations.--                                                                                           
                                                            (A)  Expenditures must be                                                                                      
                                        consistent with soil conservation plan.                                                                                            
                                        --Notwithstanding any other provision of                                                                                           
                                        this section, subsection (a) shall not                                                                                             
                                        apply to any expenditures unless such                                                                                              
                                        expenditures are consistent with--                                                                                                 
                                                                      (i)  the plan (if any)                                                                               
                                                  approved by the Soil Conservation                                                                                        
                                                  Service of the Department of                                                                                             
                                                  Agriculture for the area in which                                                                                        
                                                  the land is located, or                                                                                                  
                                                                      (ii)  if there is no plan                                                                            
                                                  described in clause (i), any soil                                                                                        
                                                  conservation plan of a comparable                                                                                        
                                                  State agency.                                                                                                            
                              Until 1954, the resolution of the question of the treatment                                                                                  
                    for tax purposes of the expenditures made by farmers to improve                                                                                        
                    their land required a highly fact-intensive inquiry.  Compare,                                                                                         
                    e.g., Collingwood v. Commissioner, 20 T.C. 937 (1953)                                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011