Steven J. and Jean L. Liddane - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         

          certain things he will be made to suffer in this or that way by             
          judgment of the court”.  Id. at 458.  Although these formulations           
          may be somewhat simplistic, they have “a valid core”, Reich v.              
          Continental Cas. Co., 33 F.3d 754, 757 (7th Cir. 1994).  Our                
          opinion in Talmage v. Commissioner, supra, cites numerous other             
          cases, in addition to those cited in VonDyl v. Commissioner,                
          supra, in which this Court and the Courts of Appeals have                   
          invariably rejected arguments that wages are not income for the             
          purposes of the income tax law.  The information given to                   
          petitioners before and at the hearing should have made clear to             
          petitioners that their case is a sure loser.                                
               The fact that “income” is not a defined term in the Internal           
          Revenue Code is of no moment.  The lack of a definition does not            
          make the 16th Amendment or the Internal Revenue Code inoperative.           
          As Judge Learned Hand stated in United States v. Oregon-                    
          Washington R.R. & Nav. Co., 251 F. 211, 212 (2d Cir. 1918), the             
          meaning of the word “income” is “not to be found in its bare                
          etymological derivation.  Its meaning is rather to be gathered              
          from the implicit assumptions of its use in common speech”.  The            
          term "income" as used in the 16th Amendment and in the Internal             
          Revenue Code "carries the meaning which an intelligent layman,              
          not an economist or a lawyer, would ascribe to it”.  Magill,                
          Taxable Income 19 (1945 rev.).  Although there was a time in the            
          early days of the Federal tax laws when the Supreme Court                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011