Laidlaw Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 71

                                        - 71 -                                        
          supra, did not involve the start of an operation; it involved               
          advances to a bank that had suffered a large embezzlement loss.             
          Courts consider capital costs other than costs to start a                   
          business in deciding whether a corporation is inadequately                  
          capitalized.  E.g., Plantation Patterns, Inc. v. Commissioner,              
          462 F.2d at 722; Tyler v. Tomlinson, 414 F.2d at 848-850; C.M.              
          Gooch Lumber Sales Co. v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 649, 657 (1968);            
          Foresun, Inc. v. Commissioner, 41 T.C. at 717.                              
                    d.   Debt to Equity Ratios of LTI and LII as Guarantors           
               Petitioners contend that we should take into account LTI's             
          and LII's debt to equity ratios because they were guarantors.               
          Even if we agreed, it would not affect our analysis.  LTI's debt            
          to equity ratios were 2.26 for 1986, 5.78 for 1987, and 5.63 for            
          1988.  LTI's debt to equity ratio averaged 4.56 and exceeded 2 to           
          1 for each of the years in issue.  LII's debt to equity ratios              
          were .67 for 1986, 3.54 for 1987, and 8.43 for 1988.  LII's debt            
          to equity ratio averaged 4.21 and exceeded 2 to 1 for the last 2            
          of the 3 years in issue.  LTI's and LII's debt to equity ratios             
          generally worsened each year in issue.                                      
               Petitioners point out that Michael J. Kennelly (Kennelly),             
          petitioners' accounting expert, stated that LTI's and LII's debt            
          to equity ratios were acceptable.  However, he used incorrect               
          assumptions in his debt to equity ratio calculations.  Kennelly             
          relied on Poppei's conclusions of value.  We are not persuaded by           
          Poppei's conclusions.  Poppei unrealistically assumed that                  





Page:  Previous  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011